# Obscura vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Obscura | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 29 526 | 92 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +442 | +57 711 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 75/100 for Obscura, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Obscura.

If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 711 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Obscura](https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/obscura-vs-omnivoice-studio