# o-spreadsheet vs open-wearables

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | o-spreadsheet | open-wearables |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 10 in Data Management | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 297 | 2 727 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +172 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | 20.0.5 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

open-wearables scores 63/100 against 49/100 for o-spreadsheet, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for o-spreadsheet.

If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; o-spreadsheet needs more configuration.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [o-spreadsheet](https://selfhost.directory/project/o-spreadsheet) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/o-spreadsheet.md)
- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/o-spreadsheet-vs-open-wearables