# nzbhydra2 vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nzbhydra2 | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Feed Aggregator | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 1 742 | 8 654 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v9.2.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 60/100 for nzbhydra2, so it is the safer default.

nzbhydra2 ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; nzbhydra2 needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nzbhydra2](https://selfhost.directory/project/nzbhydra2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nzbhydra2.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nzbhydra2-vs-workout-cool