# nut_webgui vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted [Monitoring & observability projects](https://selfhost.directory/monitoring-observability), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nut_webgui | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #61 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 436 | 93 041 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 294 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.10.5 · 23 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 50/100 for nut_webgui, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for nut_webgui.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; nut_webgui needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 294 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nut_webgui](https://selfhost.directory/project/nutwebgui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nutwebgui.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nutwebgui-vs-uptime-kuma