nut_webguivsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nut_webgui | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #61 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 436 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.10.5 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 50/100 for nut_webgui, so it is the safer default.
nut_webgui ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; nut_webgui needs more configuration.
nut_webgui details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep nut_webgui, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with