ntfyvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ntfy | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Notifications | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 137 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +739 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.34.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
ntfy scores 85/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
ntfy ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, ntfy is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
ntfy is growing faster right now (+739 stars in 30 days).
ntfy details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep ntfy, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with