npsvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nps | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 34 264 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +29 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
nps scores 74/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, nps is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).