npsvsWhirl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nps | Whirl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 34 263 | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nps scores 74/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, nps is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.
nps is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).