# nps vs Typecho

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nps | Typecho |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 34 264 ✓ | 12 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +29 ✓ | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

nps scores 74/100 against 66/100 for Typecho, so it is the safer default.

Typecho ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nps.

If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; nps needs more configuration.

nps is growing faster right now (+29 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nps](https://selfhost.directory/project/nps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nps.md)
- [Typecho](https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nps-vs-typecho