# nps vs tunesynctool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nps | tunesynctool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 34 263 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

nps scores 74/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

tunesynctool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nps.

If you want the quickest setup, nps is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.

nps is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nps](https://selfhost.directory/project/nps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nps.md)
- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nps-vs-tunesynctool