# nps vs Trenova

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nps | Trenova |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management |
| GitHub stars | 34 263 ✓ | 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +30 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

nps scores 74/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.

Trenova ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nps.

If you want the quickest setup, nps is easier to run; Trenova needs more configuration.

nps is growing faster right now (+30 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nps](https://selfhost.directory/project/nps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nps.md)
- [Trenova](https://selfhost.directory/project/trenova) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trenova.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nps-vs-trenova