# nps vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nps | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 34 263 ✓ | 15 905 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +30 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

nps scores 74/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; nps needs more configuration.

nps is growing faster right now (+30 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nps](https://selfhost.directory/project/nps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nps.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nps-vs-transfersh