npsvsTidal Echo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nps | Tidal Echo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #61 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 34 264 | 329 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +29 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
nps scores 74/100 against 47/100 for Tidal Echo, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, nps is easier to run; Tidal Echo needs more configuration.
nps is growing faster right now (+29 stars in 30 days).
nps details →Tidal Echo details →