# nps vs sidix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nps | sidix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 31/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #7 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 34 264 ✓ | 25 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +29 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.0 · 22 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

nps scores 74/100 against 31/100 for sidix, so it is the safer default.

sidix ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nps.

If you want the quickest setup, nps is easier to run; sidix needs more configuration.

nps is growing faster right now (+29 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nps](https://selfhost.directory/project/nps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nps.md)
- [sidix](https://selfhost.directory/project/sidix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sidix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nps-vs-sidix