# nps vs RustFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nps | RustFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 34 264 | 35 519 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +29 | +1 687 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

nps and RustFS score the same (74/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nps.

If you want the quickest setup, nps is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 687 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nps](https://selfhost.directory/project/nps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nps.md)
- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nps-vs-rustfs