npsvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nps | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 34 263 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +30 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 21 |
| Latest release | — | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nps scores 74/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nps.
If you want the quickest setup, nps is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).
nps details →ReadMeABook details →