# nps vs Percona Server for MySQL

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nps | Percona Server for MySQL |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #26 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 34 263 ✓ | 1 280 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +30 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

nps scores 74/100 against 61/100 for Percona Server for MySQL, so it is the safer default.

nps is growing faster right now (+30 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nps](https://selfhost.directory/project/nps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nps.md)
- [Percona Server for MySQL](https://selfhost.directory/project/percona-server-for-mysql) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/percona-server-for-mysql.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nps-vs-percona-server-for-mysql