# nps vs openHop Repeater

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nps | openHop Repeater |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #2 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 34 263 ✓ | 298 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +30 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

nps scores 74/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.

openHop Repeater ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nps.

If you want the quickest setup, nps is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.

nps is growing faster right now (+30 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nps](https://selfhost.directory/project/nps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nps.md)
- [openHop Repeater](https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nps-vs-openhop-repeater