# nps vs OctoBot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nps | OctoBot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 34 263 ✓ | 6 872 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | +257 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

nps scores 74/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

OctoBot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nps.

OctoBot is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nps](https://selfhost.directory/project/nps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nps.md)
- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nps-vs-octobot