nostr-watchvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nostr-watch | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #84 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 4 |
| Latest release | nocap-info-adapter-default@v1.2.0 · 11 Mar 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 42/100 for nostr-watch, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for nostr-watch.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; nostr-watch needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
nostr-watch details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep nostr-watch, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with