nostr-watchvsSearXNG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nostr-watch | SearXNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #84 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 38 961 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 395 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | nocap-info-adapter-default@v1.2.0 · 11 Mar 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 42/100 for nostr-watch, so it is the safer default.
nostr-watch ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.
If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; nostr-watch needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 395 stars in 30 days).
nostr-watch details →SearXNG details →
Swap a project
Keep nostr-watch, compare it with
Keep SearXNG, compare it with