# nostr-watch vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nostr-watch | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #84 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 35 299 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +528 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | nocap-info-adapter-default@v1.2.0 · 11 Mar 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 42/100 for nostr-watch, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for nostr-watch.

If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; nostr-watch needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+528 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nostr-watch](https://selfhost.directory/project/nostr-watch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nostr-watch.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nostr-watch-vs-qdrant