nostr-watchvsqdrant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nostr-watch | qdrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #84 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 35 299 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +528 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 14 |
| Latest release | nocap-info-adapter-default@v1.2.0 · 11 Mar 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 42/100 for nostr-watch, so it is the safer default.
qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for nostr-watch.
If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; nostr-watch needs more configuration.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+528 stars in 30 days).
nostr-watch details →qdrant details →
Swap a project
Keep nostr-watch, compare it with
Keep qdrant, compare it with