nostr-watchvspaperclip
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nostr-watch | paperclip | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #84 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #4 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 199 | 108 406 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +25 582 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | nocap-info-adapter-default@v1.2.0 · 11 Mar 2026 | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
paperclip scores 88/100 against 42/100 for nostr-watch, so it is the safer default.
paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for nostr-watch.
If you want the quickest setup, paperclip is easier to run; nostr-watch needs more configuration.
paperclip is growing faster right now (+25 582 stars in 30 days).
nostr-watch details →paperclip details →
Swap a project
Keep nostr-watch, compare it with
Keep paperclip, compare it with