# norish vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | norish | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 1 429 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +201 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

norish scores 61/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

unbagrnd ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for norish.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; norish needs more configuration.

norish is growing faster right now (+201 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [norish](https://selfhost.directory/project/norish) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/norish.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/norish-vs-unbagrnd