# norish vs Tuleap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | norish | Tuleap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #11 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 425 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +197 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Tuleap scores 64/100 against 61/100 for norish, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, norish is easier to run; Tuleap needs more configuration.

norish is growing faster right now (+197 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [norish](https://selfhost.directory/project/norish) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/norish.md)
- [Tuleap](https://selfhost.directory/project/tuleap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tuleap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/norish-vs-tuleap