# Nonograph vs Umbraco CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nonograph | Umbraco CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 24 in Blogging | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 324 | 5 278 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +21 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 29 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | release-18.3.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Unlicense | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 47/100 for Nonograph, so it is the safer default.

Umbraco CMS ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Nonograph.

If you want the quickest setup, Nonograph is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.

Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nonograph](https://selfhost.directory/project/nonograph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nonograph.md)
- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nonograph-vs-umbraco-cms