NonographvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nonograph | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 24 in Blogging | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 324 | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 27 |
| Latest release | v0.5.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Unlicense | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 47/100 for Nonograph, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Nonograph.
If you want the quickest setup, Nonograph is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).
Nonograph details →Umbraco CMS details →