# Nonograph vs Typecho

> Two self-hosted [Blogging projects](https://selfhost.directory/blogging), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nonograph | Typecho |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 24 in Blogging | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 324 | 12 456 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.5.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Unlicense | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Typecho scores 66/100 against 47/100 for Nonograph, so it is the safer default.

Nonograph ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.

If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; Nonograph needs more configuration.

Typecho is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nonograph](https://selfhost.directory/project/nonograph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nonograph.md)
- [Typecho](https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nonograph-vs-typecho