NonographvsTypecho
Two self-hosted Blogging projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nonograph | Typecho | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 24 in Blogging | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 324 | 12 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.5.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Unlicense | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Typecho scores 66/100 against 47/100 for Nonograph, so it is the safer default.
Nonograph ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.
If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; Nonograph needs more configuration.
Typecho is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).
Nonograph details →Typecho details →All Blogging projects →