# Nomad vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nomad | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 17 047 ✓ | 16 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +243 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Nomad.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+243 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nomad-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap