NomadvsYarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | Yarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #7 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 17 056 | 4 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 4 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.9 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 77/100 against 61/100 for Yarr, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Yarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Yarr is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep Yarr, compare it with