NomadvsWeb Rendering Proxy (WRP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 17 049 | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +80 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 4 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP).
If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+80 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), compare it with