# Nomad vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nomad | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 057 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Nomad scores 77/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Nomad is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nomad-vs-wraft