# Nomad vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nomad | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 17 054 ✓ | 1 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +81 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Nomad scores 77/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

Nomad is growing faster right now (+81 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nomad-vs-uusec-waf