NomadvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 17 052 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 9 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with