# Nomad vs UrBackup

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nomad | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 17 051 ✓ | 943 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +82 ✓ | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.38 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Nomad scores 76/100 against 60/100 for UrBackup, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UrBackup.

Nomad is growing faster right now (+82 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)
- [UrBackup](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nomad-vs-urbackup