# Nomad vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nomad | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 17 047 | 24 039 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +779 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nomad-vs-temporal