# Nomad vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nomad | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 047 | 114 252 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +3 543 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nomad-vs-supabase