# Nomad vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nomad | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 17 051 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +82 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Nomad scores 76/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.

Nomad is growing faster right now (+82 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nomad-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana