NomadvsSemaphore UI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | Semaphore UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 17 052 | 14 334 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +151 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 20 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Semaphore UI, so it is the safer default.
Semaphore UI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for Nomad.
If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
Nomad details →Semaphore UI details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep Semaphore UI, compare it with