NomadvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 17 054 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +81 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 77/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+81 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with