# Nomad vs ruptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nomad | ruptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #17 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 17 049 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +80 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Nomad scores 76/100 against 45/100 for ruptime, so it is the safer default.

Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ruptime.

Nomad is growing faster right now (+80 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)
- [ruptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ruptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ruptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nomad-vs-ruptime