NomadvsRadarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | Radarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 051 | 14 670 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +82 | +246 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 19 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
Radarr scores 78/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
Radarr is growing faster right now (+246 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →Radarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep Radarr, compare it with