NomadvsPeerTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 17 051 | 15 374 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +82 | +44 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 13 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 75/100 for PeerTube, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.
If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
Nomad details →PeerTube details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep PeerTube, compare it with