Nomadvsopenwhisk
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | openwhisk | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #2 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 17 049 | 6 803 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +80 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Scala |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 67/100 for openwhisk, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openwhisk.
If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; openwhisk needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+80 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →openwhisk details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep openwhisk, compare it with