NomadvsopenDCIM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | openDCIM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 17 054 | 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +81 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 1 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0-only |
| Main language | Go | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 77/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.
If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; openDCIM needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+81 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →openDCIM details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep openDCIM, compare it with