NomadvsOmniRoute
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | OmniRoute | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 17 054 | 82 326 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +81 | +3 310 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 77/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 310 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →OmniRoute details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with