# Nodyx vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nodyx | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 6 in Community | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 137 | 114 295 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 547 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.12.0 · 10 Aug 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Svelte | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 48/100 for Nodyx, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Nodyx is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 547 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nodyx](https://selfhost.directory/project/nodyx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nodyx.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nodyx-vs-supabase