# NodeLink vs Snapcast

> Two self-hosted [Audio Streaming projects](https://selfhost.directory/audio-streaming), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | NodeLink | Snapcast |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 14 in Audio Streaming | #1 of 14 in Audio Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 162 | 8 038 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +150 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.9.0 · 14 Sept 2026 ✓ | v0.35.0 · 10 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Snapcast scores 72/100 against 50/100 for NodeLink, so it is the safer default.

NodeLink ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Snapcast.

Snapcast is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [NodeLink](https://selfhost.directory/project/nodelink) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nodelink.md)
- [Snapcast](https://selfhost.directory/project/snapcast) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/snapcast.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nodelink-vs-snapcast